해양경계획정에 있어 분쟁당사국간 행위의 법적 효과-페루와 칠레 사건을 중심으로 KCI

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author 이창열 -
dc.date.accessioned 2020-04-19T23:40:29Z -
dc.date.available 2020-04-19T23:40:29Z -
dc.date.created 2020-02-10 -
dc.date.issued 2014-04 -
dc.identifier.issn 1226-7880 -
dc.identifier.uri https://sciwatch.kiost.ac.kr/handle/2020.kiost/1617 -
dc.description.abstract International Court of Justice(ICJ) determined that the course of the single maritime boundary between Peru and Chile on 27 January 2014. The controversial issue was whether there is an agreed maritime boundary between the Parties in this Case. The Court examined the following facts. First, does the 1947 Proclamations of Chile and Peru establish an international maritime boundary. Second, does the 1952 Santiago declaration was signed by Chile, Ecuador and Peru provide a maritime boundary between the Parties. Third, do the 1954 Agreements reflect a tacit agreement which the Parties had reached earlier. Fourth, do the 1968-1969 lighthouse arrangements include the factor concerning a maritime boundary. The Court concluded that the 1954 Special Maritime Frontier Zone Agreement cements the tacit agreement which that the maritime boundary along a parallel already existed between the Parties. The 1954 Agreement, however, gives no indication of the nature and extent of the maritime boundary. The Court ruled that the agreed maritime boundary between the Parties extended to a distance of 80 nautical miles along the parallel from its starting-point. I have some questions about the reasoning and judgment of the Court. This paper will analyze legal validity of the judgment, going through separate and dissenting opinions, and other Cases relating to maritime delimitation. -
dc.description.uri 2 -
dc.language Korean -
dc.publisher 국제법평론회 -
dc.title 해양경계획정에 있어 분쟁당사국간 행위의 법적 효과-페루와 칠레 사건을 중심으로 -
dc.title.alternative Legal Effect of Activities between Dispute Parties in the Maritime Boundary-Focused on Maritime Dispute between Peru and Chile -
dc.type Article -
dc.citation.endPage 165 -
dc.citation.startPage 135 -
dc.citation.title 국제법평론 -
dc.citation.number 39 -
dc.contributor.alternativeName 이창열 -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation 국제법평론, no.39, pp.135 - 165 -
dc.identifier.kciid ART001874022 -
dc.description.journalClass 2 -
dc.description.isOpenAccess N -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Tacit Agreement -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Peru and Chile -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor the Peace Line -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Northern Limit Line -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Maritime Boundaries Delimitation -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor 묵시적 합의 -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor 페루와 칠레 -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor 평화선 -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor 북방한계선 -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor 해양경계획정 -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass kci -
Appears in Collections:
Ocean Law and Policy Institute > Ocean Law Research Department > 1. Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

qrcode

Items in ScienceWatch@KIOST are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse