Vicarious calibration of GOCI for the SeaDAS ocean color retrieval SCIE SCOPUS

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author Concha, Javier -
dc.contributor.author Mannino, Antonio -
dc.contributor.author Franz, Bryan -
dc.contributor.author Bailey, Sean -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Wonkook -
dc.date.accessioned 2020-12-10T08:00:31Z -
dc.date.available 2020-12-10T08:00:31Z -
dc.date.created 2020-05-27 -
dc.date.issued 2019-05-19 -
dc.identifier.issn 0143-1161 -
dc.identifier.uri https://sciwatch.kiost.ac.kr/handle/2020.kiost/38857 -
dc.description.abstract A key on-orbit calibration step for satellite remote sensing of ocean color is the vicarious calibration. This establishes the final gains for each spectral band on the sensor that minimize bias in the retrieved ocean color signal. The vicarious calibration is specific to the instrument and the atmospheric correction algorithm. The vicarious calibration gains for the Geostationary Ocean Color Imager (GOCI) are presented here, which were derived to optimize the performance of NASA's standard atmospheric correction algorithm as implemented in the l2gen code and distributed through the SeaDAS open-source software package. Following NASA's protocols, the near-infrared (NIR) bands were calibrated first, and the visible bands were then calibrated relative to this fixed NIR calibration. The gain for the 745-nm NIR band was derived using a fixed aerosol model, which was chosen based on the Angstrom Coefficients derived from MODIS on Aqua (MODISA). For the vicarious gains of the visible bands, two sources for the target water-leaving radiances were tested: matchups from MODISA and climatological data from SeaWiFS. A validation analysis using AERONET-OC data shows an improvement in sensor performance when compared with results using the current vicarious gains and results using no vicarious calibration. Good agreement was found in vicarious gains derived using both concurrent MODISA and climatological SeaWiFS as vicarious calibration data sources. These results support the use of a concurrent sensor for the vicarious calibration when in situ data are not available and demonstrate that using climatology from a well-calibrated sensor like SeaWiFS for the vicarious calibration is a valid alternative when it is not possible to use a concurrent sensor or in situ data. We recommend using the gains derived from concurrent GOCI matchups with MODISA for GOCI processing in SeaDAS/l2gen. -
dc.description.uri 1 -
dc.language English -
dc.publisher TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD -
dc.subject VALIDATION -
dc.subject PRODUCTS -
dc.subject SENSORS -
dc.subject SEAWIFS -
dc.title Vicarious calibration of GOCI for the SeaDAS ocean color retrieval -
dc.type Article -
dc.citation.endPage 4001 -
dc.citation.startPage 3984 -
dc.citation.title INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING -
dc.citation.volume 40 -
dc.citation.number 10 -
dc.contributor.alternativeName 김원국 -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, v.40, no.10, pp.3984 - 4001 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/01431161.2018.1557793 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85059618804 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000463852100015 -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalClass 1 -
dc.subject.keywordPlus VALIDATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus PRODUCTS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SENSORS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SEAWIFS -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Remote Sensing -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Imaging Science & Photographic Technology -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Remote Sensing -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Imaging Science & Photographic Technology -
Appears in Collections:
Marine Digital Resources Department > Korea Ocean Satellite Center > 1. Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

qrcode

Items in ScienceWatch@KIOST are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse