A critical re-assessment of the primary productivity of the Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and Sea of Japan/East Sea Large Marine Ecosystems

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author 유신재 -
dc.contributor.author Kong Christina Eunjin -
dc.contributor.author 손영백 -
dc.contributor.author Ishizaka Joji -
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-15T11:32:16Z -
dc.date.available 2020-07-15T11:32:16Z -
dc.date.created 2020-02-11 -
dc.date.issued 2018-09-17 -
dc.identifier.uri https://sciwatch.kiost.ac.kr/handle/2020.kiost/23129 -
dc.description.abstract Despite the importance of the primary production in coastal Large Marine Ecosystems, the complex bio-optical properties in some coastal waters make the estimation of primary productivity using satellite data quite challenging. Here we critically reviewed the accuracy of parametrization of three core variables, i.e., chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-specific photosynthetic rate, and euphotic depth, in the Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and Sea of Japan/East Sea Large Marine Ecosystems. We also compared the annual primary productivity estimates of the three Large Marine Ecosystems by a depth-integrated model with those from two other global assessments which used different primary productivity models: an absorption-based model, and a time and depth-resolved model. Our assessment suggests that 1) accurate parametrization of the core variables is more important than choosing a particular primary productivity model, and 2) the previous global Large Marine Ecosystem assessments might have overestimated the annual primary productivity in the Yellow Sea by a factor of 2 or so.cally reviewed the accuracy of parametrization of three core variables, i.e., chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-specific photosynthetic rate, and euphotic depth, in the Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and Sea of Japan/East Sea Large Marine Ecosystems. We also compared the annual primary productivity estimates of the three Large Marine Ecosystems by a depth-integrated model with those from two other global assessments which used different primary productivity models: an absorption-based model, and a time and depth-resolved model. Our assessment suggests that 1) accurate parametrization of the core variables is more important than choosing a particular primary productivity model, and 2) the previous global Large Marine Ecosystem assessments might have overestimated the annual primary productivity in the Yellow Sea by a factor of 2 or so. -
dc.description.uri 1 -
dc.language English -
dc.publisher CJK IMBeR -
dc.relation.isPartOf 한중일 IMBeR Symposium -
dc.title A critical re-assessment of the primary productivity of the Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and Sea of Japan/East Sea Large Marine Ecosystems -
dc.type Conference -
dc.citation.conferencePlace CC -
dc.citation.endPage 26 -
dc.citation.startPage 26 -
dc.citation.title 한중일 IMBeR Symposium -
dc.contributor.alternativeName 유신재 -
dc.contributor.alternativeName 공은진 -
dc.contributor.alternativeName 손영백 -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation 한중일 IMBeR Symposium, pp.26 -
dc.description.journalClass 1 -
Appears in Collections:
Jeju Research Institute > Jeju Marine Research Center > 2. Conference Papers
Jeju Research Institute > Tropical & Subtropical Research Center > 2. Conference Papers
Ocean Climate Solutions Research Division > Ocean Circulation & Climate Research Department > 2. Conference Papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

qrcode

Items in ScienceWatch@KIOST are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse