A critical re-assessment of the primary productivity of the Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and Sea of Japan/East Sea Large Marine Ecosystems
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 유신재 | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kong Christina Eunjin | - |
dc.contributor.author | 손영백 | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ishizaka Joji | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-15T11:32:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-15T11:32:16Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-02-11 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-09-17 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://sciwatch.kiost.ac.kr/handle/2020.kiost/23129 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Despite the importance of the primary production in coastal Large Marine Ecosystems, the complex bio-optical properties in some coastal waters make the estimation of primary productivity using satellite data quite challenging. Here we critically reviewed the accuracy of parametrization of three core variables, i.e., chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-specific photosynthetic rate, and euphotic depth, in the Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and Sea of Japan/East Sea Large Marine Ecosystems. We also compared the annual primary productivity estimates of the three Large Marine Ecosystems by a depth-integrated model with those from two other global assessments which used different primary productivity models: an absorption-based model, and a time and depth-resolved model. Our assessment suggests that 1) accurate parametrization of the core variables is more important than choosing a particular primary productivity model, and 2) the previous global Large Marine Ecosystem assessments might have overestimated the annual primary productivity in the Yellow Sea by a factor of 2 or so.cally reviewed the accuracy of parametrization of three core variables, i.e., chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-specific photosynthetic rate, and euphotic depth, in the Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and Sea of Japan/East Sea Large Marine Ecosystems. We also compared the annual primary productivity estimates of the three Large Marine Ecosystems by a depth-integrated model with those from two other global assessments which used different primary productivity models: an absorption-based model, and a time and depth-resolved model. Our assessment suggests that 1) accurate parametrization of the core variables is more important than choosing a particular primary productivity model, and 2) the previous global Large Marine Ecosystem assessments might have overestimated the annual primary productivity in the Yellow Sea by a factor of 2 or so. | - |
dc.description.uri | 1 | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.publisher | CJK IMBeR | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 한중일 IMBeR Symposium | - |
dc.title | A critical re-assessment of the primary productivity of the Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and Sea of Japan/East Sea Large Marine Ecosystems | - |
dc.type | Conference | - |
dc.citation.conferencePlace | CC | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 26 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 26 | - |
dc.citation.title | 한중일 IMBeR Symposium | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | 유신재 | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | 공은진 | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | 손영백 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 한중일 IMBeR Symposium, pp.26 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |